It’s apparent to many of us that an alarming flirtation with Marxism has sneaked into The Catholic Church Hierarchy. Since the aims of communism are the destruction of marriage and religion nothing could be more absurd in terms of Roman Catholic survival.Mallory Millett
On Wednesday, February 9th 2022, at the American Conference of Roman Catholic Bishops of Canada, North America and Mexico, Dr. Patrick F. Fagan delivered a major address concerning the State of Marriage in Western Civilization using my Marxist Feminism’s essay combined with his analysis of the collapse of our culture. This is his take on it.
Essay by Patrick F Fagan, Ph.D.
Director, Marriage and Religion Research Initiative (MARRI)
The Catholic University of America (CUA)
(underlines by Dr. Fagan)
As I have said many times, Mallory Millett’s 2014 essay “Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives” is the most important reportage of the 20th century because it leaves for history an insider’s view of the work that is by now well on its way to bringing down Western Civilization. These highly intelligent and highly educated women were hellbent on completing Marx and Engle’s work by doing what so many (Lenin and Stalin included) could not do: destroy the family and religion, the two biggest obstacles to international materialist socialism. These women burrowed deep to find the ‘epicenter’ of society’s functioning and found it in the marital/sexual act of intercourse, where new life and the next generation of a society begins.
The question then became how to harness this insight to their own ends, the takedown of society, which Lenin had concluded would not be done by the proletariat in the West, who were too comfortable to rise up against their capitalist bosses. They deduced that the way to takedown marital sexuality (the core of a stable society) was to corrupt it. And who is more corruptible, the husband or the wife? The husband! The male goes outside of the home more and can be tempted more. Specifically, he is weak when it comes to sexual temptations.
They identified this fulcrum on which society is balanced – or teeter-totters. Corrupt the male and the family will fall. Infidelity is the big destroyer of marriage and family, of courtships and engagements, of friendships between a young man and his ‘girlfriend’.
They identified this as the foundational weakness to be exploited.
Just as the most important virtue in life is not chastity but love just as the most important aspect of sexual intercourse is not its enjoyment and the unity it brings between a loving man and woman but instead, the child it brings — its ultimate long-term, “strategic” purpose in the order of nature and creation.
However, one does not get love if chastity is absent, just as one does not get the child if the sexual is corrupted.
Motivated by a desire to destroy, the Marxist Feminists identified the way to destroy — corrupt the male and do that by placing sexual temptation all over the place. Men are suckers for it and fall easily, and with them not only the family but also the worship of God. For the young man who decides to pursue all those beautiful female bodies (sex objects) cannot simultaneously approach the Divinity — unless it be to repent. Thus, the feminists figured out how to kill the two birds (family and religion) with the one stone (sex gone wild).
The saints have often pointed towards chastity as the foundational, but not the most important virtue. Love is the most important. For the sake of all they love — their girlfriends, wives, and families, the men who are going to be husbands and fathers have to step up to the plate to save their marriages, their families and their children’s futures.
For men it takes a special courage to talk this way in male settings and a special wisdom to talk compellingly. But these ways have to be found and cultivated. Peace and prosperity depend on it so much more than they depend on a great economy and a great army, for both of these will become instruments of oppression, not freedom, as the sexual goes really wild.
All men and women and children thrive on love. It is the great source of sacrifice, joy, hope, energy, good health, courage and determination to live life to the fullest. But love —which is easy for everyone to talk about — is not enduring or possible without chastity or purity sustaining and protecting it.
All data, be it mathematics, physics, chemistry, or biology need context and framework to be interpreted and understood. The experience of life (the idiosyncratic data we all report from our experience) needs context and framework to be understood. Great religions and philosophical frameworks have been constructed over millennia to give such meaning. The most all-encompassing of these is Christ’s framework. He is either the greatest man who ever lived or the greatest charlatan, given his claim to be God. I go for the greatest who ever lived — given the fruit He has borne and the fruit of the lives of those who follow Him most closely.
On matters sexual He was radical and changed the sexual paradigm forever for humanity. There are least three ways He flagged this change … revealing man more fully to himself as it were.
1. He said, “There is no divorce” among those who believe in Him. Those baptized into the family of the Trinity cannot divorce, once fully joined, because the Trinity does not “do division.” Unity is Their essence. How did his apostles react to this? “In that case it is better not to get married.”
2. He heightened the bar still more with, “You cannot look at a woman lustfully but you have already committed adultery with her in your heart.” And when he lists sins (seemingly in order of gravity) murder comes first and adultery just behind it. (More murders are caused by adultery than anything else, so being in the #2 spot might make sense).
3. He heightened the bar still more with “celibacy for the kingdom” for the few who can take it.
One could sum up all this teaching pithily: His followers are all called to celibacy… a few for life… the majority until they are married. And even then, the difference is not as great as it seems. The celibate Christian “gives up” all persons of the opposite sex. The married give up all but one.
Thus, the virtue of chastity is central to Christian life and was one of the most obvious markers of the early Christians compared to those “pagans” around them.
Christian sexual education and formation is all about forming men and women who can live this way as adults. Among many of its benefits, this way this gives mature adults the probability of the greatest and most enjoyable and most frequent enjoyment of the sexual! The poor youth of today are sold a “pig in a poke” with modern sex ed. Sure they “enjoy” it while young (though the data indicates many are depressed by it), but they are washed up and even disinterested by the time they are in their thirties just as mature Christian adults are coming “into their own” a few years into marriage.
So, the Christian understanding of sexuality is superior in its human fruits (stable marriage, happier, healthier children, and better sexual enjoyment, greater income, health, education, longevity and happiness). The sex-ed needed to pull this off is totally different from that pushed by the secularists, e.g. in Fairfax County, Virginia, one of the Left’s experimental counties which constantly “pushes the envelope” so that they can figure out how to promote the next stage across the nation.
Furthermore, this form of sexual education and formation, is far superior in all its outcomes than anything the Left can show. The differences in outcomes are so huge the argument for the Left’s sex-ed cannot be based on outcomes and they avoid such comparisons like the plague.
This battle area is the fight to the death or to life: the death of society or the life of our families and futures. Politics and policies are fine, and that work must be done, especially the work of preserving our freedoms to have our own form of sexual education (the superior one) for our children —- but the most fundamental work is at the level of the school: in the classroom and in the home. It is here the hearts and minds (and sexuality) of our children are shaped. It is here the growth or collapse of society is forged.
That we can identify this so pointedly, we have to give thanks to Mallory Millett, Kate’s sister. It is worth re-reading her recounting of the opening of the meetings of those who founded NOW (the National Organization of Women),
Let me quote a longer excerpt than I have in the past:
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution, abortion and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Everyone must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish. — I dismissed it as academic-lounge air-castle-building.
The real men are those who step up to the plate on this, and take the education of their boys back into the home, while their wives take over the sexual education of their daughters. It is very late in the game but not too late! Many are beginning to realize the depth of the revolution that has overtaken America,
For the good of the child, the future of all nations,
Patrick F Fagan, Ph.D.
Director, Marriage and Religion Research Initiative (MARRI)
The Catholic University of America (CUA)
Much of my work has been in response to the writings of my older sister, Kate Millett, who was a Marxist-Feminist-activist in the mid-sixties of the 20th Century. Her 1970 Columbia University PhD Thesis, Sexual Politics, published by Doubleday & Company, became a runaway best-seller. After Time Magazine made her a cover story Sexual Politics became not only the cornerstone of the ensuing Second Wave of Feminism but also a trigger for other societal mischief authored by Kate and her cohorts:
- The founding of National Organization for Women through which abortion was touted and, ultimately, in 1973, judged to be a Constitutional Right for all women by The US Supreme Court resulting in, to this time (February, 2022) the murder of 70 million innocent US citizens.
- As Chairman of NOW’s Education Committee, Kate traveled America speaking and founding Gender and Women’s Studies Departments in, virtually, every college and University where our daughters are instructed to become “outlaws” and “sluts.”
- That accomplished, Kate turned to heading up “The Mental Patients Project”, wherein she maintained that psychiatric wards were unconstitutional. This resulted in NY State closing them to turn all mental patients out onto the streets, which was repeated throughout the land. Now, fifty years hence, The US is mercilessly clogged, overrun with mentally-ill, bewildered homeless people.
- In the late 70’s Kate teamed up with her idols Simone de Bouvier and Jean-Paul Sartre on The Left Bank of Paris to depose The Shah and foment revolution in Iran. These devils decided that Iran would be the ideal showcase for a Marxist State. Once it all turned wrong and fell into the hands of The Ayatollahs who threatened to put Iranian women back under the veil, Kate was inducted to lead a march of 25,000 along the main Boulevard of Tehran whereupon she pronounced The Ayatollah “a male-chauvinist-pig.” For this she was imprisoned for several days until the US Department of State was able to get her onto a plane. She recounts this event in her book, Up From Iran. We all know the ensuing horrors which have resulted from that!
Millett: Eyewitness to the Founding of Radical Feminism
Mallory Millett’s life in the public spotlight started as a runway and print model for Dayton/Hudson Corporation in her hometown of Minneapolis/ St. Paul, MN. She transitioned into a successful acting career with roles in Off-Broadway, On-Broadway and in film. A prominent member of The Actors Studio, she served as Chairman of Auditions from 2002 to 2006. She produced and starred in a feature film titled, “Deleting Spam,” which earned awards for Best Feature Film and Best Leading Actress at the IndieFest Film Festival in La Jolla, CA (2011). Mallory is a featured commentator in Arcadia Film’s production “Gender Agenda”, which will premiere on Eternal Word Television Network (EWTN) later this year.
Mallory has published nine feature articles, including one in the New York Post titled “Mental Health Madness” (September 2014). Perhaps her most recognized article, “Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives,” was called by Dr. Patrick Fagan, Director of the Institute of Marriage and Family at Catholic University of America, “the single most important reportage of the 20th century.” In 2016, the Human Life Alliance reprinted the text in brochure format and distributed one million copies to colleges and universities throughout the United States. Mark Tapson’s interview with Mallory, “My Sister Kate,” published by FrontPageMag in 2018, was reprinted in Eagle Forum Magazine (January 2019 issue).
Mallory has served as Director of the David Horowitz Freedom Center for over 27 years, and earned the honor of longest sitting Director in Freedom Center’s history. She also sits on the Board of Regents for the Center for Security Policy. In addition, she is CFO for multiple family owned corporations.
Mallory has addressed many audiences, as well, including the Israeli Embassy in New York City, and the New York All-State Conference for Life in 2017. Ann Coulter calls Mallory “the single most important commentator on feminism in America
For over 30 years, Mallory Millett has been listed in Who’s Who publications including,
Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in The World, Who’s Who of American Women, Who’s Who in Entertainment, and Who’s Who 2000 Outstanding Personalities. Most recently, she received the Who’s Who Lifetime Achievement Award.
Mallory resides in New York City.
A Favorite quote: “When women go wrong, men go right after them.” — Mae West.